Research Article

Analysis of Students’ Error in Solving Trigonometric Function Problems which Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills

Ika Sartika 1 * , Namirah Fatmanissa 1
More Detail
1 Sampoerna University, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(1), 2020, ep20002,
OPEN ACCESS   1481 Views   2942 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


International survey, such as TIMSS and PISA have indicated that higher order thinking skills (HOTS) of Indonesian students is still low. The purpose of this study is to identify students’ error in solving trigonometric function problem which assess HOTS. This is a case study research with a qualitative descriptive approach, in which the participants were all students of class IX A Science Program at SMAN X Karawang, East Karawang, Indonesia. Data was collected using test to identify students’ error in solving trigonometric problems which assess HOTS, which was develop based on the basic competence of high school mathematics and Bloom taxonomy. Beside conducting the test, the data also was collected from the interview result, where the interview will focus on the students that has low, medium, and high score on the test. Students’ errors were classified based on Newman’s Error Analysis. The result of the study revealed that the students’ errors found were comprehension error, transformation error, and process skill error.


Sartika, I., & Fatmanissa, N. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Error in Solving Trigonometric Function Problems which Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 1(1), ep20002.


  1. Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problem for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133-142.
  2. Anderegg, Frederick and Edward Roe. (1896). Trigonometry for Schools and Colleges. Boston: Ginn and Co.
  3. Ardina, I. (2018, April 20). Apa itu HIgher Order Thinking SKills (HOTS). Retrieved from
  4. Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 247-285.
  5. Carlson, M., Madison, B., & West, R. (2010). The Calculus Concept Readiness (CCR) instrument: Assessing student readiness for calculus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.2719.
  6. Chidozie, C. C., Libunao, W. H., Kamen, Y. B., & Saud, M. S. B. (2014). Implementing higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. TVEIS 2014, 633.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Boston: Pearson.
  8. Erdogan, Vacide. (2005). Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language 58 Teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education (Vol. 1).
  9. Fi, C. (2003). Preservice Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge of Trigonometry: Subject Matter Content Knowledge, Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Envisioned Pedagogy (Unpublished PhD Thesis), University of Iowa: USA.
  10. Greenes, C., Chang, K. Y., & Ben-Chaim, D. (2007). International survey of high school students’ understanding of key concepts of linearity. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 273-280). PME.
  11. Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520-532.
  12. Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The level of marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121.
  13. Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
  14. Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into practice, 32(3), 131-137.
  15. Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 year 2016 on Standard Content of Primary and Secondary Education Units.
  16. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (Vol. 1).
  17. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in nursing & health, 23(4), 334-340.;2-G
  18. Sekolah Kita. (n.d.). Retrieved from
  19. Siyepu, S. W. (2015). Analysis of errors in derivatives of trigonometric functions. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 16.
  20. Spooner, M. (2002). Errors and misconceptions in maths at key stage 2. Working towards a successful SATs. London: David Fulton Publishers.
  21. Stayanchi, J. (2017). Higher Order Thinking through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 22, 117-124.
  22. Wegerif, R. (2002). Literature review in thinking skills, technology and learning. NESTA Futurelab series.
  23. White, A. L. (2005). Active Mathematics in Classrooms: Finding out why children make mistakes-and then doing something to help them. Square One, 15(4), 15-19.