Research Article

Challenges faced by first-year university students in learning calculus

Abdullah Kurudirek 1 , Bnar Karim 2 , Delan Sarhang 2 , Eric Machisi 3 *
More Detail
1 Department of Mathematics Education, Tishk International University, Erbil, IRAQ2 Department of Humanities, Ala-Too International University, Bishkek, KYRGYZSTAN3 Department of Mathematics, Fujairah Boys’ School (Cycle 3), Fujairah, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), July 2025, ep25015, https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17298
Submitted: 18 April 2025, Published: 17 October 2025
OPEN ACCESS   58 Views   30 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study examines the calculus learning experiences of first-year university students in a multilingual classroom in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI), with a particular focus on students from diverse regional and educational backgrounds. A purposive sampling method was used to select 23 students enrolled in a foundational calculus course, including two students from central Iraq and 21 from the KRI. The study aimed to explore performance and behavioral differences in classroom engagement, particularly in response to abstract mathematical concepts such as limits. Data were collected using a structured classroom observation checklist and field notes maintained over twelve instructional sessions. The observation rubric included behavioral indicators such as participation, engagement, peer interaction, and visible confusion. A quantitative content analysis approach was employed, utilizing Likert-scale ratings to convert qualitative observations into numerical data for comparison. Descriptive and nonparametric statistical methods, including time series plots, were employed to visualize and analyze patterns in student behavior over time. The findings revealed stark differences in engagement and confusion levels between the two student groups, attributable to disparities in prior learning experiences, language proficiency, and cultural learning norms. These insights contribute to our understanding of how regional educational inequalities and linguistic diversity impact mathematics learning. The study recommends aligning the curriculum across regions and implementing bridging courses, as well as culturally responsive pedagogies, in multilingual settings. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed.
Keywords: calculus, challenges, first-year, students, university

CITATION (APA)

Kurudirek, A., Karim, B., Sarhang, D., & Machisi, E. (2025). Challenges faced by first-year university students in learning calculus. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), ep25015. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17298

REFERENCES

  1. ACAPS. (2020, November 9). COVID-19: Thematic series on education – Iraq. ACAPS. https://www.acaps.org/fileadmin/Data_Product/Main_media/20201109_acaps_thematic_report_on_education_in_iraq.pdf
  2. Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Springer.
  3. Alam, A. (2020). Challenges and possibilities in teaching and learning of calculus: A case study of India. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 407–433. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.660201
  4. Al-Husseini, S. (2015). The education system in Iraq: Problems and prospects. International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies, 9(1), 21–36.
  5. Al-Saadi, S.T.H. (2022). Mathematical excellence skill included in the mathematics book for the sixth scientific grade. Specialusis Ugdymas/Special Education, 1(43), 1498–1504.
  6. Atrushi, D. S., & Woodfield, S. (2018). The quality of higher education in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 45(4), 644–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2018.1430537
  7. Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Pearson.
  8. Bressoud, D., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (Eds.). (2015). Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus. MAA Press. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.3.0178
  9. Celik, B., & Kara, S. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the general English proficiency test: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Amazonia Investiga, 11(59), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.59.11.1
  10. Collins, K. H., Joseph, N. M., & Ford, D. Y. (2020). Missing in action: Gifted Black girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880593
  11. Dettori, J. R., & Norvell, D. C. (2020). Kappa and beyond: Is there agreement? Global Spine Journal, 10(4), 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220911648
  12. Duran, P. A., Castillo, A. J., Watson, C., Fuller, E., Potvin, G., & Kramer, L. H. (2022). Student attitudes and achievement in active learning calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(3), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2150902
  13. Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2014). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS ONE, 9(7), Article e103516. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
  14. Epstein, J. (2013). The calculus concept inventory–Measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the AMS, 60(8), 1018–1026. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1033
  15. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  16. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  17. Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
  18. Hammoudi, M. M. (2020). Measurement of students’ mathematics motivation and self-concept at institutions of higher education: evidence of reliability and validity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1670369
  19. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5
  20. Hurdle, Z. B., Akbuga, E., & Schrader, P. (2022). Exploring Calculus I students’ performance between varying course times among other predictive variables. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), Article em0700. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12234
  21. Jaani, A. N. (2022). Tertiary teachers’ instructional methods, strategies and resources used. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S1), 14161–14174. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8591
  22. Johns, C. (2020). Self-regulation in first-semester calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(3), 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00114-9
  23. Kim, Y., Park, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). A systematic review of instructional design models in mathematics education. Education Sciences, 11(3), Article 109.
  24. Kirkpatrick, A. (2017). The multilingual teacher: What English teachers need to know. Multilingual Matters.
  25. Koch, D., & Herrin, G. D. (2006). Intervention strategy for improving success rates in calculus. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--440
  26. KRG Ministry of Education. (2019). Education sector strategy 2019–2023. Kurdistan Regional Government. https://moe.gov.krd
  27. KRG Ministry of Higher Education. (2020). Higher education development in the Kurdistan Region. Kurdistan Regional Government. https://mhe-krg.org
  28. Kurudirek, A., Alrehan, H. O., Karim, B., & Sarhang, D. (2024). Sustainability of the 4.0 Revolution in university-level mathematics classrooms: Disruptions, adaptability. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 11(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v11i2p76
  29. Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6
  30. Leyva, L. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–433. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397
  31. Ling, A. N. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Challenges of teachers when teaching sentence-based mathematics problem-solving skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074202
  32. MAA. (2015). The characteristics of successful programs in college calculus. Mathematical Association of America.
  33. Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111
  34. Mesa, V. (2010). Strategies for controlling the work in mathematics textbooks for introductory calculus. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, 16, 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/016/09
  35. Mohammed, P. J., Casas, J., Saleh, S. T., & Kovács, K. E. (2021). An international comparison of educational systems: The Columbian, Iraqi and Kurdish cases. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.37441/cejer/2021/3/2/9803
  36. Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410540
  37. Rach, S., & Ufer, S. (2020). Which prior mathematical knowledge is necessary for study success in the university study entrance phase? Results on a new model of knowledge levels based on a reanalysis of data from existing studies. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(3), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00112-x
  38. Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.664593
  39. Rasmussen, C., & Ellis, J. (2013). Who is switching out of calculus and why? In A. M. Lindmeier, & A. Heinze (Ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 73–80). PME.
  40. Rešić, S., Ahmetbegović, A., & Škrobić, A. (2012). Students’ attitudes and acceptance of math studies. Human: Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.091206
  41. Rohde, A. (2014). State-building, identity and education in Kurdistan. Comparative Education, 50(3), 302–316.
  42. Rossman, G., & Rallis, S. (2017). An introduction to qualitative research: Learning in the field (4th ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802694
  43. Shanks, K. (2018). The politics of education in Iraq: The influence of territorial dispute and ethno‑politics on schooling in Kirkuk. Journal on Education in Emergencies, 4(1), 141–163. https://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/42483/2/JEiE_Vol4No1_The-Politics-of-Education-in-Iraq_August2018.pdf
  44. Stanberry, M. L. (2018). Active learning: A case study of student engagement in college calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 959–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1440328
  45. Taher, H., & Abdul, N. (2019). Impact of virtual learning environments on students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28(13), 528–536.
  46. UNICEF. (2018). Iraq education sectoral and OR+ (thematic) report (2018). United Nations Children’s Fund. https://open.unicef.org/sites/transparency/files/2020-06/IRAQ-TP4-2018.pdf
  47. Vernez, G., Culbertson, S., Constant, L., Karam, R., & Toma, R. (2016). Initiatives to improve quality of education in the Kurdistan Region—Iraq. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR960.html
  48. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  49. World Bank. (2021). Building forward better to ensure learning for all children in Iraq: An education reform path. The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/430241627636852041/pdf/Building-Forward-Better-to-Ensure-Learning-for-All-Children-in-Iraq-An-Education-Reform-Path.pdf
  50. World Learning. (2019, September 6). How a partnership is paving the way to STEM education in Kurdistan. World Learning. https://www.worldlearning.org/story/how-a-partnership-is-paving-the-way-to-stem-education-in-kurdistan/
  51. Zakaria, E., & Nordin, N. M. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75303
  52. Zipoli, M., Marchionne, S., Di Donato, M., & De Giorgi, F. (2021). Update needs analysis report: State of the art of the higher education system and its governance in Iraq. UNIMED – Mediterranean Universities Union. https://projectinspire.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/INsPIRE-D1.4-Report-on-the-Iraqi-HE-system.pdf