Research Article

An analysis of semantic structures of addition and subtraction word problems used in primary two mathematics textbooks

Tristan Matthew Wee 1 , Kai Kow Joseph Yeo 1 *
More Detail
1 National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, SINGAPORE* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(2), 2024, ep24011, https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14690
Published Online: 11 June 2024, Published: 01 July 2024
OPEN ACCESS   63 Views   50 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In this study, addition and subtraction word problems based on the semantic structures are analyzed in the sole primary two mathematics textbooks and accompanying workbooks used in Singapore. Based on a conceptual coding framework, the word problems were coded accordingly. The results revealed a significant representation of combine and compare structures across all contents in both the textbooks and accompanying workbooks. In particular, the lack of word problems involving change structure suggests an unequal distribution of the semantic structures. Based on the findings, it is recommended that educators and textbook authors to be aware in providing students the opportunity to be equally exposed to the various semantic structures in the teaching and learning of both the addition and subtraction word problems.

CITATION (APA)

Wee, T. M., & Yeo, K. K. J. (2024). An analysis of semantic structures of addition and subtraction word problems used in primary two mathematics textbooks. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 5(2), ep24011. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/14690

REFERENCES

  1. Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.2307/748348
  2. Cheng, L. P. (2015). Error analysis for arithmetic word problems–A case study of primary three students in one Singapore school. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 16(4).
  3. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders’ solution strategies of elementary addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 363-381. https://doi.org/10.2307/749085
  4. Grouws, D. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan Publishers.
  5. Heller, J. I., & Greeno, J. G. (1978). Semantic processing in arithmetic word problem solving. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association.
  6. Howson, A. G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts. Pacific Educational Press.
  7. Lee, N. H., Yeo, D. J. S., & Hong, S. E. (2014). A metacognitive-based instruction for primary four students to approach non-routine mathematical word problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(3), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0599-6
  8. Lim, L. S. (2020). The study of schema-based instruction and visual representation to support arithmetic word problem solving for lower primary students in Singapore [Doctoral dissertation].
  9. Lindorff, A. M., Hall, J., & Sammons, P. (2019). Investigating a Singapore-based mathematics textbook and teaching approach in classrooms in England. Frontiers in Education, 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00037
  10. Ma, X., Bofferding, L., & Xin, Y. P. (2021). Addition and subtraction word problems tasks in reform-based textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 121(5), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12468
  11. Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527890
  12. MOE. (2020a). Mathematics syllabus: Primary one to six. Curriculum Planning and Development Division.
  13. MOE. (2020b). TIMSS 2019: Singapore students continue to excel in mathematics and science. Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20201208-timss-2019-singapore-students-continue-to-excel-in-mathematics-and-science
  14. MOE. (2022a). Primary mathematics textbook 2A. Star Publishing.
  15. MOE. (2022b). Primary mathematics textbook 2B. Star Publishing.
  16. MOE. (2022c). Primary mathematics practice book 2A. Star Publishing.
  17. MOE. (2022d). Primary mathematics practice book 2B. Star Publishing.
  18. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  19. Múñez, D., Orrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compares word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.715095
  20. Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. Cambridge Assessment. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf
  21. Peltier, C., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Hott, B. L. (2022). Strategies to help students solve addition and subtraction word problems. Beyond Behaviour, 31(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211072260
  22. Pepin, B. (2008). Mathematical tasks in textbooks: Developing an analytical tool based on ‘connectivity’ [Paper presentation]. The 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education.
  23. Pepin, B. (2018). Enhancing teacher learning with curriculum resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues (pp. 359-374). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_17
  24. Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250
  25. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. Jossey-Bass.
  26. Sievert, H., van den Ham, A., & Heinze, A. (2021). Are first graders’ arithmetic skills related to the quality of mathematics textbooks? A study on students’ use of arithmetic principles. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101401
  27. Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249-275. https://doi.org/10.1086/461725
  28. Thompson, C. S., & Hendrickson, A. D. (1986). Verbal addition and subtraction problems: Some difficulties and some solutions. Arithmetic Teacher, 33(7), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.33.7.0021
  29. Usiskin, Z. (1999). Which curriculum is best? University of Chicago School Mathematics Project Newsletter, 24, 3-8.
  30. Van de Walle, J. A., Lovin, L. H., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2018). Teaching student-centered mathematics: Developmentally appropriate instruction for grades PreK-2. Pearson.
  31. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). Information Age Publishing Inc.
  32. Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
  33. Vicente, S., Orrantia, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Influence of situational and conceptual rewording on word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 829-848. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907x178200
  34. Vicente, S., Sánchez, R., & Verschaffel, L. (2020). Word problem solving approaches in mathematics textbooks: A comparison between Singapore and Spain. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(3), 567-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00447-3
  35. Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., Sánchez, R., & Múñez, D. (2022). Arithmetic word problem solving. Analysis of Singaporean and Spanish textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111, 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10169-x