Research Article

Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Science Tutors and Its Influence on Their Trainees

Moses Abdullai Abukari 1 , Jonas Bayuo 1 * , Alaric Awingura Alagbela 1 , Christopher Saaha Bornaa 2
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, GHANA2 Department of Mathematics and ICT Education, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), 2022, ep22008, https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11830
Published: 03 March 2022
OPEN ACCESS   961 Views   592 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study presents the pedagogical content knowledge of science tutors of colleges of education and its impact on the pedagogical content knowledge advancement of teacher trainees. A descriptive survey design was employed to obtain data for the study using 120 teacher trainees and six science tutors from two colleges of education. The research instruments used for the study were a questionnaire, interview guide, and observation checklist. The study found that the pedagogical content knowledge demonstrated by the science tutors was dependent on the number of years of teaching experience and qualification. Out of the six tutors, two tutors demonstrated the highest pedagogical content knowledge with 10-12 years of teaching experience. The Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was found to be reaching unity suggesting that the science tutors’ pedagogical content knowledge has a very strong positive influence on their teacher trainees’ pedagogical content knowledge development. About 62.5-87.5% of their pedagogical content was influenced by the pedagogical content knowledge of their tutors. Based on the findings, the study recommends adaptation of a transformative model of pedagogical content knowledge, for initial training of teacher trainees starting out as teachers and continuous training for experienced teachers who are learning to teach new subjects. This will offer a mechanism for changing practice.

CITATION (APA)

Abukari, M. A., Bayuo, J., Alagbela, A. A., & Bornaa, C. S. (2022). Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Science Tutors and Its Influence on Their Trainees. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), ep22008. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/11830

REFERENCES

  1. Adi Putra, M. J., Widodo, A., & Sopandi, W. (2017). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and integrated approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012144. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012144
  2. Alkis-Kucukaydin, M., & Ulucinar Sagir, S. (2016). An investigation of primary school teachers’ PCK towards science subjects using an inquiry-based approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 87-108.
  3. Asplin, K. N., & Marks, M. J. (2013). Increasing the influence of university supervisors during student teaching. The Professional Educator, 37(1), 1-10.
  4. Avoke, M. (2001). Some historical perspectives in the development of special education in Ghana. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250150501789
  5. Azam, S. (2020). Locating personal pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers within stories of teaching force and motion. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8941
  6. Bayram-Jacobs, D., Henze, I., Evagorou, M., Shwartz, Y., Aschim, E. L., Alcaraz-Dominguez, S., Barajas, M., & Dagan, E. (2019). Science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development during enactment of socioscientific curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(9), 1207-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21550
  7. Chee, J. D. (2018). Pearson’s product-moment correlation: Sample analysis. University of Hawaii at Mānoa School of Nursing.
  8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
  9. Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (2008). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-3327
  10. Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020110
  11. Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20473
  12. Goes, L. F., Fernandez, C., Eilks, I., & Education, C. T. (2020). The development of pedagogical content knowledge about teaching redox reactions in German chemistry teacher education. Education Sciences, 10(7), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10070170
  13. Haji, S. A., Moluayonge, G. E., & Park, I. (2017). Teachers’ use of information and communications technology in education: Cameroon secondary schools perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 147-153.
  14. Jan, H. V. D., Onno De, J., & Nico, V. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572-590.https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10010
  15. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285
  16. Kind, V., & Wallace, R. (1970). Train, teach; taught? How the content of specific science subject matter knowledge sessions impacts on trainee teachers’ classroom practice and children’s learning. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.290
  17. Melo, L., Cañada-Cañada, F., González-Gómez, D., & Jeong, J. S. (2020). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) of physics teachers in a colombian secondary school. Education Sciences, 10(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120362
  18. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y
  19. Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
  20. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  21. Park, S., & Steve Oliver, J. (2008). National board certification (NBC) as a catalyst for teachers’ learning about teaching: The effects of the NBC process on candidate teachers’ PCK development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 812-834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20234
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  23. Skedsmo, G. (2020). Assessment and evaluation with clarifying purposes for policy and practice. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09323-x
  24. Sothayapetch, P., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2013). Primary school teachers’ interviews regarding pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and general pedagogical knowledge (GPK). European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 84-105. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9390
  25. Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M., Fazio, C., & Tarantino, G. (2006). Pedagogical content knowledge development and pre-service physics teacher education: A case study. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 235-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9004-3
  26. Sufian, A. J. M. (2015). Methods and techniques of social research. International Journal of Business and Statistical Analysis, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbsa/020204
  27. Thompson, J. R., Christensen, W. M., & Wittmann, M. C. (2011). Preparing future teachers to anticipate student difficulties in physics in a graduate-level course in physics, pedagogy, and education research. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010108
  28. Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740402
  29. van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Routledge.
  30. Williams, P. (2003). A passion for learning begins with a spark: Message from the president. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/a-passion-for-learning-begins-with-a-spark
  31. Zembal-Saul, C., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2002). Elementary student teachers’ science content representation. Ournal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10032