Research Article

Video Lessons via YouTube Channel as Mathematics Interventions in Modular Distance Learning

Alvin Odon Insorio 1 2 3 * , Daniel Manansala Macandog 3 4
More Detail
1 College of Graduate Studies and Teacher Education Research-Philippine Normal University, PHILIPPINES2 San Pedro College of Business Administration, PHILIPPINES3 San Pedro Relocation Center National High School - Main Campus, PHILIPPINES4 Polytechnic University of the Philippines - San Pedro Campus, PHILIPPINES* Corresponding Author
Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), 2022, ep22001,
Published: 03 January 2022
OPEN ACCESS   6054 Views   7138 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Modular distance learning is a new learning delivery modality implemented by most public schools in the Philippines. However, as seen on the summative test result for the first grading period, students struggled in Grade 7 Mathematics using the self-learning modules. Hence, mathematics concepts were hard to understand and not explained well in the module. To address the problem, the teacher made video lessons and uploaded them to the YouTube channel Direct to the Point by DM as interventions. A YouTube channel as an avenue to upload educational videos has been used before the pandemic. This platform’s advent can be used in delivering mathematics interventions since the students preferred to watch videos. This study aimed to assess the Mathematics video lessons via a YouTube channel for modular distance learning. This was a practical action research design following the PDSA model that utilized the participants’ pretest and the posttest scores. Also, open-ended surveys and interviews were conducted to elicit qualitative data to support the quantitative findings. The result reveals that video lessons help the students understand the mathematics concepts complementing lessons on the modules. Moreover, they enjoyed watching the teacher-made videos since they see the teacher explaining the lesson. However, the students suggested having regular posting of videos with more examples and explanations having clear and loud voice of the teacher.


Insorio, A. O., & Macandog, D. M. (2022). Video Lessons via YouTube Channel as Mathematics Interventions in Modular Distance Learning. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 3(1), ep22001.


  1. Benedict, L., & Pence, H. E. (2012). Teaching chemistry using student-created videos and photoblogs accessed with smartphones and two-dimensional barcodes. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(4), 492-496.
  2. Bernardo, J. (2020). Modular learning most preferred parents: DepEd. ABS-CBN News.
  3. Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012) Effects of a digital intervention on the development of algebraic expertise. Computers & Education, 58(1), 197-208.
  4. Broto, A. (2008). Statistics made simple (2nd ed.). National BookStore.
  5. Bullo, M. (2021). Integration of video lessons to Grade-9 science learners amidst COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(9), 67-75.
  6. Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2014). An examination of undergraduate student’s perceptions and predilections of the use of YouTube in the teaching and learning process. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 17-32.
  7. Clark, K. P., Stearne, D. J., Walts, C. T., & Miller, A. D. (2010). The longitudinal effects of resisted sprint training using weighted sleds vs. weighted vests. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(12), 3287-3295.
  8. Clifton, A., & Mann, C. (2011). YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 311-313.
  9. Copper, J. M., & Semich, G. W. (2019). Professional development in the twenty-first century: YouTube teacher training and professional development. In M. Habib (Ed.), Advanced online education and training technologies (pp. 185-199). IGI Global.
  10. Dangle, Y. R. P., & Sumaoang, J. (2020). The implementation of modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools. In 3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education (pp. 100-108).
  11. Dankel, S. J., Mouser, J. G., Mattocks, K. T., Counts, B. R., Jessee, M. B., Buckner, S. L., & Loenneke, J. P. (2017). The widespread misuse of effect sizes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(5), 446-450.
  12. de Villarreal E. S. S., Requena, B., & Newton, R. U. (2010). Does plyometric training improve strength performance? A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Medicine Sport, 13(5), 513-522.
  13. de Villarreal, E. S. S., Kellis, E., Kraemer, W. J, & Izquierdo, M. (2009). Determining variables of plyometric training for improving vertical jump height performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(2), 495-506.
  14. Department of Education. (2020). Adoption of the basic education learning continuity plan for school year 2020-2021 in the light of the covid-19 public health emergency.
  15. DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., Yaakub, M., Ayob, J., & Ishak, R. (2013). The potential of Youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103,1118-1126.
  16. Farhan, R. N. (2019). Online discussion via Facebook Messenger: Impact on students’ test performance of William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies.” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(2), 4782-4787.
  17. Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (2010). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  18. Given, L. (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE.
  19. Hansen, K. T., Croni, J. B., Pickeringm, S. L., & Newton, M. (2011). Does cluster loading enhance lower body power development in preseason preparation of elite rugby union players? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(8), 2118-2126.
  20. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Szeto, E., Tsai, C. R., Kuo, Y.-C., & Hsu, W. Y. (2016). Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 214-222.
  21. June, S., Yaacob, A., & Kheng, Y. (2014). Assessing the use of YouTube videos and interactive activities as a critical thinking stimulator for tertiary students: An action research. International Educational Studies, 7(8), 56-67.
  22. Jung, I., & Lee, Y. (2015). YouTube acceptance by university educators and students: A crosscultural perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(3), 243-253.
  23. Lee, C. S., Osop, H., Goh, D. H., & Kelni, G. (2017). Making sense of comments on YouTube educational videos: A self-directed learning perspective. Online Information Review, 41(5), 611-625.
  24. Lydersen, S. (2020). Mean and standard deviation or median and quartiles? The Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, 140(9).
  25. Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: the case of YouTube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37-42.
  26. Muniyandy, S., Khuenyen, N., Yap, C. G., Shogo, M., My, N. A., Chowdhury, M. E. H., & Musa, A. F. (2015). Influence of YouTube videos on the learning of tablet- and capsule-formulation by Malaysian pharmacy students: A pilot study. Pharmacy Education, 15(1), 248-251.
  27. Okeniyi, J. O., Okeniyi, E. T., & Atayero, A. A. (2015). Programming development of Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit testing of data normality as a Microsoft Excel® library function. Journal of Software & Systems Development, 2015(2015), Article ID 238409.
  28. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival manual: A step by step to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 15). Allen and Unwin.
  29. Ranga, J. (2017). Customized videos on a YouTube channel: A beyond the classroom teaching and learning platform for General Chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 867-872.
  30. Sharma, L. R. (2021). Analysis of difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency of multiple choice questions of speech sounds of English. International Research Journal of Makawanpur Multiple Campus, 2(1), 15-28.
  31. Soong, T. T. (2004). Fundamentals of probability and statistics for engineers. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  32. Subhi, M. A., Nurjanah, N., Kosasih, U., & Rahman, S. A. (2020). Design of distance lectures in mathematics education with the utilization of the integration of Zoom and YouTube application. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1663, 1-7.
  33. Tan, E., & Pearce, N. (2011). Open education videos in the classroom: Exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1), 125-133.
  34. Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1-32.
  35. Terlumun, I. T., Appollm, Y. I., Ibrahim, F. J., Mamman, F. S., Yusuf, A. K., & Ibrahim, A. H. (2018). Determining the effectiveness of YouTube videos in teaching and learning with Mozdeh algorithm. International Journal of Education and Evaluation,4(4), 100-110.
  36. Vural, O. F. (2013). The impact of a question-embedded video-based learning tool on elearning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1315-1323.
  37. Williams, A. J., & Pence, H. E. (2011). Smartphones, a powerful tool in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 683-686.
  38. Zhou, Q., Lee, C., Sin, S., Lin, S., Hu, H., & Ismail, M. F. (2020). Understanding the use of YouTube as a learning resource: A social cognitive perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(3), 339-359.